- Freeloading off those who contribute to newsletters, magazines, and discussions boards when they might only lurk.
- Freeloading off those who prepare and present educational sessions at meetings while they never share their knowledge.
- Freeloading off those who devote personal time and money to perform volunteer responsibilities to lead the association while they sit back and observe.
- Freeloading off those who solicit donors to fund new programs and recruit new members to broaden the dues base while they note they don't like to do sales.
- Freeloading off those who contribute to PACs and lobby actively while they do nothing to shape regulations that affect them.
- Freeloading off those who take the risk to offer honest feedback that brings about meaningful change while they remain silent or just gossip.
So by all means, feel a brief moment of dues-paying smugness when you meet a member of your profession who didn't join the association, but freely reads its magazine, the one he borrows from a colleague who is a member.
But if our only contribution is in the form of being a joiner writing a check and not being a contributor, remember we also could be chastened with the Scarlet F of Freeloader. In fact, at any given time, other than keeping our dues current, we all freeload and let others contribute in ways that we aren't. That's the way it has always been; that's the way it probably always will be.
Many ways exist to evaluate whether or not someone is a contributing member of an association or community. Paying dues is one of the most obvious metrics, one we've used for a very long time. But those who write, speak, mentor, advocate, fundraise, share, and present pay their dues as well, and we are foolish to not value them for doing so, regardless of whether or not they join our associations. For in many cases it is those contributions on which others freeload the most.