To break things up a bit in 2011, I will be offering a leadership limerick each Monday, highlighting an idea or strategy about effective leadership in limerick form.
Making things better should be our aim
Learning from mistakes, not assigning blame
Suggesting changes big and small
Working daily to improve all
Is that improvement or innovation in name?
At the ASAE Great Ideas Conference on Sunday, the opening keynote speaker Matthew May stressed the importance of designing elegant solutions that solve people's problems. I asked him later whether he made much of a distinction between innovation and improvement since many people struggle with the difference between those terms.
May replied that assigning labels too often is an unhelpful academic exercise, saying that the process of making things better is what counts. He asked, is the iPad a major innovation as some claim or just a series of well-designed improvements on previous tablets? And ultimately, does it matter to the customer, or do they just care if it improves their lives? He instead drew the link between more around improvements vs. breakthrough or exponential innovations (gamechangers).
His take is interesting and I haven't fully decided to what degree I agree. I do know that when you talk about innovation with some people, they seem to shut down, where speaking of improvements and making things better seems to keep them engaged and committed.
What do you see as the distinction between improvements and innovations, and when/how do you find it most helpful to make it?
March 14, 2011
Leadership Limerick: The Responsibility to Make Things Better
Labels: leadership limerick
I once did many things for many people: strategy, speaking, program development, workshop design and more. I still do so in limited quantities while on an extended writing sabbatical writing, Say Yes Less: Why It Matters and How To Do It..