How would our personal and professional development efforts change if we viewed everyone as an emerging leader? This is the question I’ve been thinking about recently as I have seen more organizations establishing emerging leaders programs, and I've been invited to help design them or speak during one of their sessions.
Though any additional commitment to lifelong learning is
generally a good thing, I’m wondering how the categories and containers
we are creating for our programming efforts might enhance or impede our
ultimate objectives. Emerging leaders and future leaders efforts are
usually targeted at individuals who meet any of the following criteria:
(1) are young in age; (2) have minimal experience (usually a few years)
in the given profession or organization; or (3) hold more entry-level or
intermediate positions within an organization’s hierarchy.
This all seems to make sense … catch promising stars at an early
stage of development and then accelerate it with a significant
professional leadership conference. But what comes after you’ve been
pegged as an emerging leader? After attending the retreat or
conference, what might we now call you … Arrived Leader? Fully Emerged
What happens all too often in organizations is that graduates of
these significant experiences are left to their own devices until they
meet any of the following criteria: (1) are older in age; (2) have
significant experience (usually 7-10 years) in the given profession or
organization; or (3) hold more significant positions within an
organization’s hierarchy. At this stage we classify them as Senior
Professionals or Executive Professionals and again offer them some
What occurs (or doesn’t occur) between these two time periods
concerns me because we don’t offer enough challenge and support to help
individuals continue their path of lifelong learning and development.
You’re either coming on to the scene or a scene senior. That’s not
going to cut it if we expect to retain top talent and fully engage their
wisdom, creativity, and insights for the good of organizations and the
stakeholders they serve.
Emerging leaders is really an unfortunate misnomer when applied
as described above. In reality emergence is an ongoing state of
personal and professional development. It’s “cradle to grave,” an
expression I recently heard a colleague use. The critical issue is not
what type of leader you’ve become, but what type of leader you are becoming.
We simply must break free of the episodic notion of leadership
development all too common in most professions and organizations.
Organizations need to embrace a more expansive view of leadership
development, chart multiple cradle to grave pathways for their
profession that are inclusive and flexible, help individuals assess
their developmental needs at any given point on the pathways they have
chosen, and then connect them to appropriate learning experiences and
Let’s hope such a leadership development philosophy more fully
emerges in the years ahead, and let all of us do what we can to ensure
that it does.